The pictures drawn by the participants were evaluated by the researcher in light of some keys of the Non-existent Animal Test. In this study, pictures drawn by 154 university students for the “Non-existent Animal” projective test were examined. Another difference is that it is not restrictive. S/he could be more cooperative due to lack of anxiety for not being able to make the picture similar to anything. Drawing something that does not exist is different from drawing something that exists. The most important one is that the “thing” to be drawn is something that does not exist. There are a number of important differences that distinguish “Non-existent Animal” Test from other similar tests. “Non-existent Animal” test, which is projective in nature, has been used as an individual recognition technique in many countries, especially in Russia. "Evaluation of the Pictures Drawn by Adults for ‘Non-Existent Animal’ Test by Gender." European Journal of Educational Research, vol.
Halmatov, 2020, 'Evaluation of the pictures drawn by adults for ‘non-existent animal’ test by gender', European Journal of Educational Research, vol. "Evaluation of the Pictures Drawn by Adults for ‘Non-Existent Animal’ Test by Gender," European Journal of Educational Research 9, no.
European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1115-1125. Evaluation of the pictures drawn by adults for ‘non-existent animal’ test by gender.
0 kommentar(er)
